We are Gods 2: FONTS and PARAGRAPHS


… limited to a minimum number used … one, two at most.

I agree that multiple fonts confuse the eye if they are very different from one another. But you might use Open Sans for most text and Open Sans Narrow for chapter titles and Open Sans italic for subsections. Or use a font like Deja Vu because it has serif and non-serif versions to distinguish large sections from subtitles. 

Some title fonts don’t come with an italic version, in which case another font, that is only an italic font, can be used that pairs up well.

… eReaders [render unpredictably] … a font that may look fine on an iPad may not render the same way on a Kindle or other device…

Absolutely. The question for me was, what’re the programs doing? I have a test title on Amazon. I load all kinds of variations of stuff in there to see what it looks like on multiple devices.

The variations included: serif or non, normal or italic, relative size.

I create all my titles on Google Docs (I don’t have Word. I download an rtf file and upload to Amazon.) in Georgia because the font size jumps from 14pt to 18pt. That relativity seems to be maintained by programs even if the style changes. The 4pt difference is best for the way I format a time jump or point of view change, and usually shows up well no matter what I view it on:

Rendering the 4pt difference at a time jump.

Spacing is an issue. Some programs can smoosh your lines together for a solid black body of almost unreadable text. Not user-friendly.

I got these numbers from an article on eBook formatting:

  • Line spacing 1.39
  • Add line after paragraph

And from the same source:

  • left justify
  • no first line indent

This is how the text on this image from my Kindle was formatted. Traditionally:

All paragraphs should be indented. …

Print books are indented to save paper.

That’s it. If there’s a space between graphs it adds a significant number of pages. If there’s no space and no indent, the book is one long paragraph and close to impossible to read.

Indenting without spacing is difficult to read on most cell phones or readers. IF you keep the extra spaces between graphs like Amazon does, it’s not terrible. But many programs don’t.

Here’s a comparison between a Draft to Digital rendering and a Kindle rendering. (Note that Kindle now has left justification.) D2D had a problem with consistency.

D2D on the left, Kindle on the right, rendering the same draft.

The right side format takes up more room, but we aren’t paying for paper, ink or shipping costs. You might like the page on the left better. If so, do that. But don’t do it because someone said you should.

For me, as a reader, the indent fatigues my eyes far more, making several small adjustments to find the next line, rather than one.

I also rarely write a graph longer than four lines so my readers don’t face a sold block of text. The most basic question in formatting is: what’s best for the reader?

As our own publishers, we make these choices. We experiment or see what works in other eBooks.  Over time, a consistent style will emerge, naturally. We are creating tradition.

NEXT: EMPHASIS FORMATTING (italics and underlines and CAPS, oh, my!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s